INDIA NEWS
Supreme Court disposed of a PIL on cow vigilantism, stating it cannot monitor lynching incidents across India from Delhi.
By Aniket Chakraborty
Feb 13, 2025
Arrow
Arrow
The bench referenced its comprehensive 2018 guidelines that provided preventive, remedial, and punitive measures against mob violence.
2
Arrow
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta highlighted that mob lynching is now a separate offense under the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3
Arrow
Court clarified that victims or their families can approach competent courts if authorities fail to comply with guidelines.
4
Arrow
The bench rejected the plea for uniform compensation, stating compensation should vary based on the severity of injuries in each case.
5
Arrow
Supreme Court directed challenges to state-specific cow protection laws to be taken up with respective High Courts.
6
Arrow
The PIL, filed by National Federation of Indian Women, specifically highlighted concerns about violence against Muslims by cow vigilantes.
7
Arrow
Five states - Assam, Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Maharashtra and Bihar - were previously warned for failing to file counter-affidavits.
8
Arrow
Original 2018 judgment required each district to designate nodal officers for preventing mob violence.
9
Court emphasized that its 2018 directions are binding on all authorities under Article 141 of the Constitution.
10